Governmentalizing Indian Education and Creating Generations of Cultural Pariahs
Ananda Coomaraswamy's farsighted and incisive observations of the ruin caused by British colonial education system
Ananda Coomaraswamy wrote several articles about the nature of the British-imposed Indian education and alerted Indians about its perils. Because he mostly wrote for a scholarly audience, he didn’t quite use the forthright language that Swami Vivekananda did. He clearly, forcefully enunciated the nuances behind what Swami Vivekananda expounded to an ostensibly lay audience. One of the most celebrated quotes of Coomaraswamy on the disasters of English education follows:
His essay, Education in India is a reader’s treat for the range of problems it examines, and equally, for the solutions it suggests. Read together with Memory in Education, it shows what was and what is possible.
Coomaraswamy opens the first essay with his characteristic candour in condemning the more evil facets of British imperialism.
The perception that British education somehow “liberated” India and bestowed upon us a “modern education” persists till date. Coomaraswamy demolished this myth as early as 1909 when the calculated destruction of native learning systems was unfolding right before his eyes. In his time, he noted that an average English-educated Indian was unable to appreciate, nay, understand his own culture.
The last line is a crushing indictment of our collective cultural amnesia. Coomaraswamy reserves strong words for Lord Maculay, the man who started this process of cultural colonisation. Addressing the British educators in a tone of undisguised scorn, Coomaraswamy asks them why they’re unable to recognise the Indian babu, “made in [their] own image” by their "…most pompous and self-important philistine, Lord Macaulay, [who believed that] a single shelf of a good European library was worth all the literature of India, Arabia, and Persia."
Indeed, the latest incarnation of Macaulay’s colonial Indian inheritors goes by the label of “Idea of India.” However, in small and numerous ways, Coomarswamy’s prediction is slowly ringing true. Today, there’s renewed interest to study all aspects of Indian cultural heritage with quite some appreciable zeal although efforts are scattered, far and few, and not really up to the mark.
Coomaraswamy’s condemnation of the British education system stemmed from several sources. His main concern was that English education replaced something invaluable with something worthless. It put the student in a paradox: on the one hand the student was cut off from his roots and on the other, he would be unable to fully acquire the culture and/or “viewpoint” of the imperialist. He becomes a second class citizen—in every which way—among the Westerners despite imbibing their culture, and he becomes a cultural orphan among his own people: "…in actual fact, it is not the English point of view [that is acquired] but a caricature of it."
Coomaraswamy then quotes the other vandal of Hindu culture, Abbe Dubois on the subject:
And this belief that Indians needed to be educated stemmed from the assumption that India was a savage country, “which it is England’s divine mission to civilize.” It is reasonable to conclude that Macaulay operated from this racist, colonial-supremacist mode.
When Macaulay’s notorious education policy was first put into action, the British faced tremendous difficulties as Coomaraswamy points out. Sir Thomas Munro wrote that “if civilization were to be made an article of commerce between two countries, England would soon be heavily in debt.” Prof. Nelson Fraser “shows how little the English teacher can know of the real life of [Indians]…” and that "The Englishman is the last person to put forward any view as to possible reforms in Hindu institutions."
Coomaraswamy also narrates how the English educators who arrived in India to teach were completely lost. Even in their sincerest attempts to learn more about Indians, they found that the more “[the teacher] understood, the less would he wish to interfere, for he would either be Indianised at heart, or would have long realized the hopeless divergence” between English and Indian ideals.
Coomaraswamy says that the idea of education should be separated from the “notion of altering the structure of Indian society.” Any alteration or change or in his words, “true reforms come only from within and slowly.”
The British however, did not heed any of these real problems reported from the field. They devised the education system such that Indian ideals, philosophy, arts, and languages were crushed without bloodshed.
One way to do that was by bringing education under government control. Ananda Coomaraswamy writes that few indigenous institutions that imparted education in Sanskrit and Arabic “carry on a forlorn struggle for existence.” India had a rich tradition of education built on the gurukula system or Pathashala system sponsored and supported by society with little or no adverse government interference. By “governmentalizing” education, the British cut off a long and unbroken tradition almost overnight. Any autonomous institution would die an eventual death. This aspect is brought out in vivid, excruciating detail in Dharampal’s volumes, most notably, the Beautiful Tree.
The British assault on Indian education also had the Missionary dimension. Coomaraswamy writes that Missionary education avowedly "…practises intolerance–by endeavouring to destroy that culture, in schools where education is offered as a bribe and where the religion of the people is of set purpose determined."
This practice continues even today where some Christian schools forbid female students to wear bindi, bangles, etc, all sacred symbols of Hindus.
Ananda Coomaraswamy repeatedly stresses on the ideal of education than a mere system of education. As an idea, education should “draw out or set free the characteristic qualities of the taught.”
In Memory in Education, he notes that culture, “in the East has been only secondarily connected with books and learning; it has been a part of life itself,” echoing R.K. Mookerji. From this, it wouldn’t be incorrect to say that culture is the agglomeration of the education of several centuries. That is, any national culture is shaped by the education it receives. Which is why today we notice that most urban cities in India are fast turning into cheap replicas of their counterparts in the West. Or the fact that the ubiquitous keyboard is quickly replacing traditional Indian instruments as the choice of instrument for aspiring musicians.
Coomaraswamy also emphasizes that the “distinction between wisdom and knowledge must never be forgotten,” which reminds us of T.S. Eliot. Wisdom, according to Coomaraswamy is therefore the “true end of education.” He quotes Knox speaking about the culture of the people of Ceylon.
And quotes a Sinhalese proverb, "Take a ploughman from the plough and wash off his dirt and he is fit to rule a kingdom."
And attributes this astonishing feature to the existence of a national culture not dependent on the knowledge of reading and writing. He laments throughout these essays that this treasure has been lost almost forever thanks to English education.
The most visible wound of this all-round damage is that today, we have to read our own literature in a foreign language. That the glut of Mahabharatas written today by Indian authors is in English is an admirable effort. Yet almost none of these authors have read the original in Sanskrit–or in their mother tongue–because they don’t know the language.
In the end, Ananda Coomaraswamy offers a seven-point remedy to overcome this. I quote most of them verbatim (in italics).
A universal philosophical attitude, “contrasting strongly with that of the ordinary Englishman who hates philosophy.”
The sacredness of all things–the antithesis of the European division of life into sacred and profane… In India…religion idealises and spiritualizes life itself rather than excludes it.
The true spirit of religious toleration, illustrated continually in Indian history…
Etiquette–civilization conceived of as the production of civil men. In other words, education should enable a civilization where life should bring forth culture, not theories and books.
The renewal of the special relationship between teacher and pupil and a return to the epics, classics, and in general, literature which has stood the test of time. …the epics as embodying ideals of character, learning [as] a privilege demanding qualifications, not to be forced on the unwilling…extreme importance of the teacher’s personality. Coomaraswamy frowns upon the modern practice of “making everything easy for the pupil.”
The basis of ethics should spring from altruism and not from religious or other commandments. This follows from the “recognition of the unity of all life.”
Development of personal character and conduct. As educational aids, Coomaraswamy lists them as control of thought, speech and action, concentration, one-pointedness and a “capacity for stillness.”
His essays lament the loss of these ideals, which existed for centuries despite Islamic invasions and occupation. However, it was only the British axe that dealt it the fatal blow.
Coomaraswamy’s criticism might seem severe but he is not blind to some of the advantages English education brought for India. Even here, he says, these benefits tilt the balance in favour of preserving Indian culture. To close this series in his words:
The Dharma Dispatch is now available on Telegram! For original and insightful narratives on Indian Culture and History, subscribe to us on Telegram.